Educational Technology Blog
Teaching is now not seen as a profession for life, and is often more something that someone drifts in an out of. The name of the UK programme to attract the best graduates Teach First implies that teaching is something those candidates will do for a small amount of time before starting their next career (which in itself is a shame as they take their teaching experience with them, and the Government subsidy is lost to the profession). Some of these people will come back into teaching, but the process for doing so seems to be trapped in the past.
The difficulty arises as more teachers move in and out of teaching during their careers.
It is good practice for schools ask for references before interviews take place. However, the questions asked are not always relevant for people who are not currently teaching; for example, asking how the candidate performs with students. In other cases, it is not possible to give permission for schools to obtain references before an interview as in some jobs this spells the death of a career.
Accessing confidential information
Some stories are horrifying: mine is that one of the top non-selective state schools in the country decided to send me confidential student data at 23:00 before an interview the following day. The fact that I did not possess a DBS criminal check at the time did not seem to worry the school. I’m still unsure what expected me to do with it as my lesson had been planned some time before.
How do practicing teachers find it possible to attend job interviews?
This is a question as many people outside teaching do not realise that it is not possible to take a personal day, or select your holiday when working in a school.
Teachers take their holiday when the school is closed, and are not offered the discretion that some students are in taking holidays during term time (even if they are parents themselves). Only around half of teachers take one or more sick days in a year, and of the remaining 50 percent they often come to work even when they are not fit to do so as even when sick teachers are expected to work (by providing lesson plans, perhaps completing reports or marking even when too sick to come to work).
It turns out that schools will allow you to go, covering the absence internally (with other employed teachers) or by buying in cover at cost. Most of the time a head teacher will give you paid leave to attend an interview at another school; but they don’t have to (I’ve heard rumours that some academies do not pay teachers for interview days).
Schools sometimes give 48 hours’ notice or less for an interview. This can work for someone working a school environment (although it can be inconvenient to a head teacher, or a teacher running exam classes), but how can a parent returning to the profession from raising a child arrange childcare? What about a job where requesting a day’s leave at such notice is unprofessional?
The image that schools project should be important. As teaching is losing many teachers with years of experience there must be an open door to allow these people a way back into the profession. Schools need to do better.
Typing in “Schools should” into Google UK this morning leads with the top story from the BBC that Schools should teach pupils how to spot ‘fake news’. Beyond that, schools should be like Dragon’s Den, Schools should be doing more to prepare young people for the world, the bewildering Schools should teach children how to brush their teeth and schools should teach all pupils ‘digital citizenship’.
Putting aside the ease with which various organisations (think tanks, the OECD, university vice-chancellors and others) feel free to assign work to schools. Academy schools and Independent schools in the UK do not follow the National Curriculum and simple have to offer a broad an balanced curriculum including the core subjects of mathematics and English. This means that many state schools (Over 50% of secondary schools in the UK are academies) do not even have a requirement to teach vital subjects like computing, let alone various activities that the media report should be taught.
Teachers might listen to the news reports this week imploring them to teach students how to recognise fake news, yet this is the time of year where teachers are particularly busy preparing students for exams. Some teachers aim to run sessions with tutor groups, but in running a discussion class may face misinformation from their own class members; further spreading fake news.
The broad answer has always been schools and particularly individual teachers try their best to give students a rounded education. However teachers are sometimes put under pressure to teach students about various topics, sometimes encouraged by grieving parents but lacking the oversight of any body considering what topics are the most important or how the material is best delivered.
We do know that fake news is becoming an issue in the media, if only as a buzz word. In the same way that a student might call a variety of actions hacking in a computing lesson (with little understanding of the meaning of the term), students can become lost in the way that they process media and understand the world around them.
OFCOM report on the way that children consume media, and the move away from traditional media is an important one that students need to develop their critical understanding to be able to make value judgements around the content they consume.
To help teachers and students, there are resources available. From a simple poster, to an assembly or a full lesson there are materials available that help teachers to grasp the topics and deliver quality material to their students.
Finding images on the Internet
Looking on the Internet for images to use for projects, whether for students or for teachers can often be problematic, but there are some fantastic sites available for use.
One of the best sites for Public Domain images that I found is unsplash has a great set of attractive photographs that can be used for any purpose (even commercial so selling lessons on TES is completely fine).
One of the most ways to find images that you can use (even for commercial work) is to use Google. Image search allows you to look for images with alternative usage rights.
Once you have searched for an item you can click on the tools icon, and select the usage rights that you desire. However you should be aware that the system provides a false sense of security and does not always work, and that you should check the image on the original website wherever possible.
As an author, or posting work on the Internet (even if it is not paid content) you do need to be careful around the notion of usage rights as there are punishments for violations. The 10% rule for educational use of copyright material (which would not apply for paid work, or that posted on the Internet as is made clear), is itself is a myth.
Which brings us to the confusion around conflating copyright cleared materials, the public domain and attribution (SWGFL do not distinguish all three with their copyright free material for the classroom work).
Some materials are in the Public Domain, and can be used for any reason. You don’t need to reference who created the work, or do anything apart from use the images.
Some authors allow you to use their work, but ask to be recognised (attribution).
Some work you can use upon payment (Shutterstock providing images for national newspapers and the BBC).
Some great links
Along with the previously mentioned unsplash, I use some great sites for images.
I love the more complex images on freepik, but these must credit the author. This means that text recognising the original author has to be added to your final work (which may not be ideal).
People often feel that files on flickr are in the public domain; no so since each image has a different set of rules to follow upon publication
Recently the BBC have report that a private school in California will benefit from the recent Snap (makers of SnapChat) IPO which has raised a huge amount of money for the business.
The school took the opportunity to invest in the App after being encouraged to by a venture capitalist parent.
There are obvious differences in the business and education environments between the UK and the US. However it is interesting is that both the parent and the school were able to see the SnapChat phenomenon at the very start of the product, and have benefited from this to the tune of $24m.
Looking to the future:
How might parents and schools leverage the knowledge of students?
How can education benefit from the ideas that student have?
Will there be an educational version of SnapChat in the future?
How would we know if the next revolution in education was right in front of us?